












With the one that costs most per week. Usually that is either a structural gap, such as empty midweek or a dead season, or a leak, such as group enquiries going unanswered. Fixing a leak is faster and cheaper than creating demand, so we look there first, then move to the bigger structural work.
It depends on the problem. Booking flow and enquiry handling can improve within days. Creative fatigue and targeting take a few weeks. Seasonality and memberships are measured across a season, because you are changing behaviour rather than capturing demand that already exists. We set expectations per problem rather than promising one timeline.
No, and doing so makes it impossible to tell what worked. We prefer to change one variable at a time where the trading calendar allows it. The exception is a broken measurement setup, which we fix immediately, because every other decision depends on being able to see what actually happened.
These are the problems operators bring us most often, in the words they use. A real account usually turns out to be two or three of them at once, plus something specific to the venue. If yours is not here, it is almost certainly a version of one of these, and the first call is about working out which.
We pick the number the problem is actually about, then hold it. Filling midweek is measured on midweek bookings, not on blended cost per booking, because a strong weekend hides the failure. A launch is measured on paid bookings in the opening weeks. Retention is measured across a season. One headline number per problem, agreed before we start.